When Your Shitty Health Insurance Doubles in Price

Well, despite Mr. Money Mustache’s outrageous optimism, I think we all saw this coming. I opened up my premium renewal email from Kaiser and saw this:

Figure 1: My new insane medical insurance premiums for the minimum available “Bronze” program, with a $6500 deductible.

My family’s monthly health insurance premium, which had already more than doubled in the last few years to $674 per month, was going up a further 44% for the coming year. For no good reason, other than perhaps the the current government’s attempts to kill off the Affordable Care Act. (By cutting various parts of the structure, the insurance market becomes less stable and predictable, and thus more expensive).

Now, before we go any further, I have to note that this is a situation that only affects high income earners. If we were really retired on a $30,000 passive income as we were for some of the decade before this blog started making significant money, our family’s monthly cost would be more like $128, due to tax credits and the Children’s Health Plus plan.:

Figure 2: Net insurance cost for a $30k per year family of three.

But in my email, I just saw the thousand bucks. And if you know how I feel about rules, unnecessary costs, and insurance in general, you can probably guess what my initial gut reaction was:

“Fuck. FUCK THAT! This is absolute bullshit. Fuck you, I quit, I’m not paying it.”

But, since I’m not sixteen years old anymore, I was eventually able to get past this first stage of the analysis and think about an actual course of action.

After all, all the power and freedom in the world is of no use at all, if you choose to wallow in your anger rather than taking steps to create the life you want. So I thought about why I was so angry. It boiled down to this:

The premiums are not an accurate representation of my risk.

The value of medical insurance is pretty easy to estimate: the National Institute of Health calculates that the average person consumes about $449,000* in health care spending over an 80-year lifetime, or $5600 per year.  This is less than my plan’s deductible alone, which eliminates the value of insurance right off the bat. My plan really only covers catastrophically expensive events, which means it is unlikely that I will ever use it.

Plus, most medical spending is loaded towards the last decades of life, where the Medicare program already picks up the bulk of the costs. And, we are healthier than average – aside from one baby delivery about twelve years ago, none of us have ever actually benefited from health insurance in over nineteen years in the country.

When you add up these factors, it is obvious that the insurance is a bad deal. When presented with overpriced insurance, I always just choose not to buy it, which is also called “self-insuring”. But whenever I talk about self-insuring for medical expenses, everyone asks the same question:

“But what if you do get hit by a falling piano and have to spend months in the Intensive Care Unit?”

The answer is that I guess I’d receive some large medical bills!

I’m not denying that an expensive treatment absolutely can never happen to me. I’m just putting an estimate and a limit on how much I am willing to pay for insurance on it.

Remember, health insurance is not really health insurance. It’s just “large medical bill insurance” – a shaky precaution against having to pay for expensive procedures, so you can keep your investments instead of using them to pay the bills, perhaps eventually becoming poor enough that you are covered by public health insurance (Medicaid). A better name for it might be wealth insurance.

We have been trained to think that going without medical bill insurance is very risky. But that’s just because the subject appears frequently in the news. If it weren’t such a hot topic these days, the average person without a chronic illness would rarely think about it.

After all, by comparison, what precautions have you taken against being hit by a meteorite? There could be one streaking towards you right now. It could kill you, or your children, or it could leave you with a lifetime of chronic care costs. Are you telling me you don’t have separate meteor insurance? Why not?

In 2013 a 60-foot chunk of rock came from space and hit Russia with the force of 30 Hiroshimas. The human race escaped with just 1500 injuries, but only because the rock came in at a shallow angle and landed in a very remote area.

If space rocks are too far-fetched, how about motor vehicles? If you choose to drive a car, you are willingly throwing yourself into a far riskier situation than simply self-insuring for medical bills. Even more dangerous, statistically: being inactive and/overweight, a boat in which over 66% of us sail every day.

The point is that while huge, uncovered medical bills are inconvenient, they are rare. Therefore, my willingness to pay for insurance against them must have a limit. I’d definitely pay $50 per month for it, but should I be willing to pay $1000?

What about $2000? $4000? $12,000 or $1 million per month? I think that everyone would hit their “Fuck That” point somewhere in there.

And remember, this problem of expensive medical procedures is unique to the US. You can take your dollars almost anywhere else in the world and pay out-of-pocket to get the same (or better) quality care for a fraction of the cost. At some point, a rational person has to be willing to stop overpaying for this inefficient system.

After doing the math, I decided that my limit is definitely less than $1000, which means I should at least consider other options. So I looked into some of them:

  • Full Self Insurance
  • 2.9 Months per year of Self Insurance (to avoid IRS penalty)
  • Medical Tourism
  • joining a “Healthshare Ministry” like Libertyshare
  • expat insurance like Cigna
  • Artificial poverty (reducing my income to a level where we’d qualify for subsidies)

Self Insuring is the easiest choice: you just don’t renew your insurance and start banking that sweet surplus right away.  There is a tax penalty for that: $695 per adult, $347 per child, or 2.5 percent of your adjusted gross income – whichever is greater. Thus, a family with $100,000 of income would pay a $2500 fee. With my new premium at $11,500 per year, the penalty would still be cheaper all the way up to $461,000 in income. Plus, there are a surprising number of qualifying exemptions, including a death in the family within the last three years, a category which unfortunately includes me.

A 90 Day Insurance Vacation is the lightweight version of self-insurance. The penalty only applies if you were uninsured for three months or more. So if you start your insurance during the enrolment period but then cancel it on, say, October 2nd, you cut your premiums by about 25% in exchange for the reduced risk protection. Just be sure to postpone your Wingsuit Jumping vacation until at least the new year.

Medical Tourism is an important thing that every US resident should be aware of. After all, we live in the country with the most overpriced medical procedures in the world – why should we insist on doing 100% of our shopping here? This would be like insisting you buy only US-produced goods and services: no electronics, no shoes, no Amazon and no blueberries in winter. We should all read a book or two on the subject to understand just how easy it is, to free ourselves from the US-centric assumption that doctors are shockingly expensive.

There’s a lightweight version of medical tourism too: simply comparing insurance pricing from one state and city to another.  From a quick search I see that Colorado is one of the more expensive states for health insurance, with New York being the worst, and the best three being California, Utah and New Mexico. As with everything, it’s good to shop around when choosing where to live, and regularly challenge yourself by asking, “Is this where I’d settle down if starting from scratch?”

Health Sharing Ministries  like Liberty HealthShare looked like the most promising loophole. Due to the strong influence of organized religion in the US, if you can join one of these, you are exempt from the tax penalty. The downside is the same as the upside: these ministries are exempt from ACA rules, which means they can drop you for having a pre-existing condition. And they also want you to affirm their value system, which can range from agreeable stuff like “taking care of your health” to excluding coverage for things that violate religious taboos like abortion or attempted suicide.

Expat Insurance sounded promising when I first heard about it from some fellow Canadian early retirees who write the blog Millennial Revolution. Companies like Cigna will cover you for worldwide medical costs for a fraction of what we pay here in the US. But the hitch is it only applies if you are truly on the road and don’t actually reside here. So it’s not an option for now. But in the long run when I retire to an oceanfront compound (or commune?) in Costa Rica, yes.

Reduced Income is the last and least feasible option on the list for me right now, but it’s genuine and not even artificial in the case of the typical early retiree.

Suppose you are retired with, say, a mortgage-free home and $800,000 in index funds, and living on a plentiful $30,000 per year. Your income tax return will show only about $18,000 in dividends, some of them even tax-exempt. On top of that, you’ll sell just a few shares and pay taxes only on the capital gains. This taxable income in the mid-20s will keep you in a very low tax and health insurance bracket.

 So What Path Did the Mustache Family Take?

I brought all this stuff up to Mrs. MM – the other, less morally-outraged, leader of our household.  Our conversation brought up a few things:

  • Although a $12k insurance bill is insane, we would not even notice a $12,000 difference in income taxes if the brackets were to change. We currently have a high income, but this has not caused us to increase our family spending at all. This is because of the magic of living below your means: once you have enough money, the surplus is just that: a big, fat, awesome bonus. Since I want this enormous surplus to go back to society over my lifetime, why should I be upset about some of it paying for other peoples’ health insurance right now?
  • But, I countered, this doesn’t apply to everyone. The typical MMM reader earns enough money to be hit by these higher premiums, and many are raising families and running small businesses, thus purchasing health insurance on the open market. At the same time, they are trying to save as much money as possible to reach financial independence while they are still young enough to enjoy it. Burning $12,000 per year on mostly-useless insurance can wipe out 25% or more of the amount you could otherwise save for retirement.
  • Given this, the Healthshare ministry was one of the better compromises. However, she felt that pretending to agree with a religion (especially if it’s one that actively oppose some things we value like same-sex couple equality and women’s reproductive rights) wasn’t worth it for us.
  • In my own hypothetical pre-retirement situation (a self-employed couple making $200,000)  I would probably go for full self-insurance, simply paying the tax penalty whenever necessary and using medical tourism for any expensive procedures.
  • But also remember that if you’re a high-income business owner, your business can pay for your health insurance with pre-tax money. This cuts your net cost after taxes by 30-40%, making it a subsidized program after all.

So in the end, we’re just letting the policy auto-renew for now, using that last bullet point as a consolation prize.  And these premiums will probably remain outrageous, unless we fix the underlying problem in the US: it’s not the insurance, it’s how much money we waste on medical care. If the Medical system could grow a Money Mustache**, I am certain we could cut our costs down by at least 75%, just as the average consumer can cut their costs by a similar portion just by learning to life a joyful and efficient life.


Further Research:

After this article came out, a reader told me about the site “Health Care Bluebook“, which allows consumers to look up typical costs of various medical procedures. Many are less expensive than I had assumed.


* I adjusted the NIH paper’s 2000 numbers to 2017 dollars.

** Ideas for making US healthcare less expensive – please critique and add your own in the comments!

  • Eliminate the 75% of healthcare spending we currently waste on self-imposed lifestyle diseases: eliminate subsidized urban car infrastructure in favor of muscle-powered transportation. Treat soda and products with added sugar in the same way we currently treat liquor. Treat health and fitness (rather than medical treatment) like a human right, instead of a vanity accessory just for rich mountain-dwellers and celebrities.
  • Make health care purchasing look more like Wal-Mart and Amazon, and less like the DMV. Every standard procedure needs to be listed on a menu with a price, and those need to be on the front door so they are subject to competition. By huge national or even international companies and co-ops.
  • Drastically increase the supply of doctors, and make the job more enjoyable: Cut mandatory work hours for residents from 80 to 40 per week. Modernize the medical school curriculum to eliminate pointless memorization, reflect current technology and reduce the cost of the degree.  Open the borders to qualified doctors from other countries. Allow telemedicine – let doctors in other countries certify easily for US diagnostics and prescriptions.
  • Elevate nurses to do all the stuff they already do, but in their own clinics without working for a doctor and paying the money up the chains.
  • Start using search engines and artificial intelligence for diagnosis, rather than flawed and expensive humans.
  • Open state and national boundaries for insurance and hospital services with only the required regulations for safety as we do with other imports.
  • Eliminate the right for anybody to sue for medical malpractice, or indeed for pretty much anybody to sue anybody else for anything. Let’s make our professional reputation and our actions public and then just suck it up like adults, reinvesting the enormous proceeds currently wasted on litigation.
  • Figure out if we can make single-payer health insurance work for us as it already does for most countries. There are many benefits, but the biggest is probably just eliminating all the mental energy we each waste on thinking about this mundane topic. As an analogy, imagine if every citizen had to hire their own police force for personal security – just think of how much energy and fear would be wasted on this topic, which we barely have to think about right now. As it turns out, it works the same way with health insurance.





  • Jim October 26, 2018, 1:18 pm

    I’m 60 and have the nest egg taken care of, since my wife and I have been practicing what you preach for over 35 years, in great income periods and bad. We actually read “Your Money or Your Life,” and “The Millionaire Next Door” (my personal fav) way back, only to find out we had already adopted most of the habits and suggestions.

    I was released from my last, good-paying job six years ago when the company collapsed and I took a 40+% pay cut to get new work at age 55, a situation I think many Americans find themselves in that contrasts with your constantly rising income situation. The fact that my employer gives “raises” that lag the inflation rate is also pretty common for many working Americans. It has put a serious dent in the amount of money we currently can sock away, so we have had to rely more on the mass of what we did before and the market to make portfolio profits.

    So – besides the fact that age is a factor in hiring – why am I still working at a job that does not pay me well?

    Well, three reasons:

    1.) Mainly, it’s the damn health insurance costs. The ACA site is very confusing, since I can plug in a very slightly different set of inputs and get a completely different rate structure. But the fact is, minus subsidies, it would cost us $14,000-plus per year to cover my wife and I (October 2018). In contrast, at my workplace, about two-thirds of my costs are paid by my employer, so I am out only about $4,500.

    2.) As an older person, I see how health care costs and risk profiles spiral up as you age, so your need for insurance to protect your wealth increases. This is a perspective you may not have considered yet, I don’t know. But I think it is important to understand how your risk and costs rise as you age – especially for those who retire super-early to a fairly fixed income.

    The actual costs chart swings dramatically upward for many people past an average age of 50. Also, the risk of a catastrophic event grows each year after 50. I recently read that a person over age 50 can expect to spend $267,000 on healthcare between that age and death.

    Then, there is long-term care to consider – not all of which is even covered by Medicare after age 65, if the patient has assets. Those must be completely depleted in the US before Medicaid can take over. (Note: There are wealth strategies involving use of trusts that can preserve wealth in these events by transferring it, but they must be undertaken prior to the event. See a financial advisor.) The costs can be a shock, as we have learned recently with my father. So healthcare insurance has the longer-term effect of insuring more of the wealth against depletion in long-term care, in the event long-term care insurance or trusts were not in place.

    3.) There is a small pension at my work if I stay 10 years (4 more to go) and reduced rate supplemental insurance post-retirement. That’s a lifetime annuity benefit, but the least motivator for me.

    Everything we own is paid for, and even with the current dramatic market downswing chopping away at our investment wealth considerably, at our present portfolio total to this minute, we’d have about $24K per year even if, unlike you, we had no other sources of income. But after paying ~ $14K for health care insurance, we’d have less than $10K to live on. Even very frugal people like ourselves would be hard-pressed to make ends meet at less than $10K.

    And so I continue to work. Healthcare is the major reason my life plans to retire at 55 did not materialize and it is why I keep going. To be honest, the income also keeps me from drawing off my portfolios in shaky economic times, but if that were the only deciding factor, I’d be retired.

    Risk rises with each year lived and so concurrently does your need to insure against financial calamity in the US system. In my 30s, this was far from my consciousness. But it is top of mind now.

    Sure, you can do medical tourism – provided you have the time. A heart attack or stroke – the leading causes of medical bankruptcy – do not lend themselves to medical tourism well. Neither does dementia, COPD, many cancers and a lot of other calamities that steadily become more possible as one ages, and just as steadily will drain accumulated wealth.

    I saw you last night with Paul Solomon on PBS, and I found that like most journalists when interviewing on this subject, he fell in love with the retire early prospect and failed to probe this healthcare insurance question and also query you on a couple other salient points – including the fact that you and everyone else he interviewed had a money-making blog, and so you are not really doing the 4% withdrawal retirement thing. Nothing wrong with making money, I endorse it highly. I just think it should have been part of the conversation.

    Anyway, that interview is why I searched the blog.

    I’ve run all kinds of numbers to find a solution, but it just isn’t there.

    One last comment before I shut up! :-) Even though my early retirement plans did not pan out, I would not change our living below our means and saving/investing lifestyle for anything. I wish I had started 10 years earlier, but I have to educate myself on it minus the Internet. Living this lifestyle ensured that, no matter what economic calamity befell us at any time, we would have the resources to make it through and not have to resort to desperate measures. That is a feeling only financial independence can deliver.

  • Early-and-Often November 4, 2018, 9:58 pm

    It will be interesting to see the early and long-term results of the Amazon-Berkshire-JP Morgan-backed venture for their nonprofit healthcare initiative announced in June 2018.

    CEOs Bezos, Buffett and Dimon framed the goal as improving outcomes for their employees’ while reducing costs.

    The initiative’s widely respected CEO, Atul Gawande (surgeon and public health author), indicated a strong focus on targeting inflated administration costs as well as lots of middlemen.

    NPR, Bloormberg and NYT articles from June 2018:




  • EJ December 5, 2018, 6:48 pm

    Any update on how you plan to handle health insurance coverage in 2019? The two big changes I am aware of are the removal of the penalty for not having coverage and expanded availability of short term health insurance plans (from 3 months to 36 months).

    I am still researching but considering switching to a short term plan which would be $40 a month for catastrophic coverage (and excludes prescriptions, maternity care, and mental health care). The deductible and out of pocket max are also higher (10K+ 4K) and the insurance company is only A rated. The plan also has a 1 million max payout.

    There are considerable drawbacks(that I identified so far) to the short term plans but it seems much more representative of my risk as a healthy young person vs a bronze plan for $230 a month.

    Any other changes to the health insurance/health care landscape to be aware of? Any other downsides to the short term plans?

  • anonymous December 11, 2018, 11:26 pm

    What are the health insurance costs for 2019?

    • Mr. Money Mustache December 13, 2018, 12:43 pm

      The best answer is to look up the insurance costs for your own family and income situation at healthcare.gov.

      For a family of three similar to the 2018-era MMM family, I looked it up and the premiums are unchanged for 2019. But Mrs. MM and I are no longer married in 2019 so we’ll be covering ourselves separately.

  • Glenn February 19, 2019, 11:20 pm


    I’d like to hear which group you’re enrolled with. I read over the Liberty site and I didn’t feel comfortable about how they presented the plan. It sounded like they “probably might” cover your bills, but if they didn’t “tough luck, chump”. There were disclosures everywhere saying “this is NOT insurance”.

    If you’re still pleased with the group you are with it would be great to hear which one it is.

  • Brittany May 1, 2019, 1:38 pm

    “Cut mandatory work hours for residents from 80 to 40 per week. ”

    Whoa – I was with you up until this point. You dramatically do not understand how medical education works.

    Residency is, for all intents and purposes, the primary period in which doctors learn to be doctors. Medical school gives you some background, but residency is where you do the heavy-lifting, education-wise.

    It is a shockingly bad idea to reduce the amount of time spend in residency. People are sicker these days than ever before – advances in medical technology mean that people are living longer, with more chronic conditions and more complex conditions than they did in the past.

    80 houts per week is the bare minimum you can spend in training without starting to see serious quality concerns or to need to increase the numbers of years spent in post-graduate training. And frankly, 80 hours isn’t enough for a lot of specialties. It’s a dirty secret that the surgeons just ignore the work hour limits and lie on their hours. Increasing the number of years doctors spend in training will be wildly unpopular. We already sacrifice ten years of our lives in training – you want to increase that to 15 years by doubling the time we spend in training? No, thanks. People can only delay starting their lives for so long – you’ll see a reduction in people entering the medical field with this proposal, unless you are willing to accept doctors with half as much training as they currently have. Anyone think that’s a good idea?

    You’ve also over-simplified. We don’t need to dramatically increase the supply of *all* doctors, we need to dramatically increase the supply of primary care physicians. There are already a number of initiatives in place to encourage people to enter primary care, but it’s paid less than a lot of sub-specialties. This is a policy discussion with unique considerations that you are glossing over at a highly superficial level.

    I’d stay away from medical education if I were you. Or at least, do some more research before you make naive suggestions about how we can fix it.

  • Lisa May 15, 2019, 6:27 pm

    The FDA needs to go. Why? Here are just a few reasons:
    – Six or seven years to get a drug approved
    – Trials are usually redundant
    – Trials are sometimes “peer” reviewed by boards comprised of people who work for competing companies that have no incentive to let new drugs that compete with their own pass so they stall
    – After said nearly decade-long trials, the drugs still don’t work and people die due to complications anyway!

    Good times. All of this has just the teeny-tiniest bit to do with cost of care and prescription drugs being mega-expensive.


Leave a Reply

To keep things non-promotional, please use a real name or nickname
(not Blogger @ My Blog Name)

The most useful comments are those written with the goal of learning from or helping out other readers – after reading the whole article and all the earlier comments. Complaints and insults generally won’t make the cut here, but by all means write them on your own blog!


welcome new readers

Take a look around. If you think you are hardcore enough to handle Maximum Mustache, feel free to start at the first article and read your way up to the present using the links at the bottom of each article.

For more casual sampling, have a look at this complete list of all posts since the beginning of time or download the mobile app. Go ahead and click on any titles that intrigue you, and I hope to see you around here more often.

Love, Mr. Money Mustache

latest tweets